Page 19 - TACC 2025 Program
P. 19

Serta, Mitel Decisions:


              Words Matter in LMT Transactions






              Lately, borrowers and their counsel have             Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas
              increasingly relied on proverbial “loopholes” in     (“Bankruptcy Court”) in January 2023. Serta
              their loan documents to restructure their capital    next proposed a Chapter 11 plan that offered a
              structure and shore up liquidity through so-called   debt-for-equity swap to the Participating Lenders
              “liability management transactions” or “LMTs”.       and Bankruptcy Court approval of the Indemnity.
              Through an “uptier” transaction, the participating   Serta and the Participating Lenders separately
              lenders vote by majority to amend the credit         initiated litigation (Litigation) requesting a
              agreement to permit the funding of new priming       declaratory judgment of the Bankruptcy Court
              loans, and exchange on a cashless basis all or a     that the 2020 LMT was contractually permitted.
              portion of existing loans into the new senior debt.   The Excluded Lenders counterclaimed for money
              Non-participating lenders often initiate litigation to   damages flowing from the breach of the original
              challenge the validity of the LMT under the terms    credit agreement. In March 2023, the Bankruptcy
              of the original credit agreement.                    Court entered partial summary judgment in favor
                                                                   of the Participating Lenders, characterizing the
              One closely watched “uptier” transaction involved
              the 2020 LMT consummated by Serta Simmons,           credit agreement as unambiguously providing a
              Inc. (“Serta”) and lenders holding a majority        great deal of flexibility to Serta to engage in the
              of the existing loans (Participating Lenders),       exchange transaction under the “open market
              whereby the Participating Lenders were given         purchase” provisions. The Bankruptcy Court
              the opportunity to exchange, on a cashless basis     concluded that the relevant “market” was limited
              and at a discount, first-lien and second-lien loans   to the holders of Serta’s first-lien debt under
              into superpriority “first-out” term loans under a    the original Credit Agreement itself. An order
              new credit agreement (2020 Uptier Facility),         confirming the Serta Chapter 11 plan issued
              through amendments to the credit agreement and       on June 6, 2023. (Confirmation Order). The
              intercreditor agreement, to rank the 2020 Uptier     Bankruptcy Court’s orders were appealed to the
              Facility ranked ahead of the original debt held by   Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a consolidated
              the remaining lenders (such lenders, the Excluded    basis.
              Lenders). This distribution of value on a non-pro    On Dec. 31, 2024, the Fifth Circuit issued its
              rata basis was permitted, according to Serta, as     Opinion, reversing the rulings of the Bankruptcy
              an “open market” purchase. Nonetheless, Serta        Court, holding that the exchange executed by
              agreed to indemnify Participating Lenders for all    Serta as part of the 2020 Uptier Facility did not
              claims asserted as a result of participation in the   qualify as an “open market” purchase under well-
              2020 Uptier Facility (Indemnity).                    settled contract interpretation principles. The Fifth
                                                                   Circuit noted the importance of the “sacred right”
              After the Excluded Lenders challenged the 2020
              Uptier Facility in New York State Court, Serta       of ratable treatment of all participating lenders of
              commenced a Chapter 11 case with the U.S.            the same class in a syndicated loan transaction.
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24